神刀安全网

Angular 2 Providers using Map Literals

ng-conf happened just one week ago and there were many announcements about all things Angular. While this is good, sometimes these big announcements cause smaller features to remain unseen, because nobody really talks about them. That’s why we want to discuss providers using Map literals in this article, which is basically a new way of defining providers that landed just recently in the code base.

Provider recap

So what is it all about? Well, if you’ve read our articles on Dependency Injection in Angular 2 , you know that an injector needs something called a provider, that knows how to create an object of a certain type, or for a specific token.

In other words, if we ask for a service dependency in one of our components like this:

import { Component } from '@angular/core'; import { MyService } from './my-service.service'; @Component({   selector: 'my-component',   template: '{{myService.sayHello()}}' }) class MyComponent {    constructor(private myService: MyService) {} }

We would run into an error, because even though, we import MyService and use that type to annotate our constructor parameter, there’s nothing that tells Angular (or the injector) what to do, when someone asks for something of that type. Of course, Angular could simply automagically call new on the given type and that’s it, but then there’s no way to replace the actual dependency with an object of a different type, or maybe even the way we want to construct a dependency (class vs. factory vs. value).

That’s why Angular has the concept of providers, which basically act as a sort of recipe that describe how an object of a certain type is created.

import { Component } from '@angular/core'; import { MyService } from './my-service.service'; @Component({   selector: 'my-component',   template: '{{myService.sayHello()}}',   providers: [MyService] // creates a provider for MyService }) class MyComponent {    constructor(private myService: MyService) {} }

You might know that adding a provider as shown above is actually a shorthand syntax for developer ergonomics. The same logic can be expressed with this more verbose syntax:

import { provide } from '@angular/core';  @Component({   ...   providers: [     provide(MyService, { useClass: MyService })   ] }) class MyComponent {   ... }

This enables us to create objects of different types, or even use completely different ways of constructing objects like using a factory function, or simply injecting a value.

// creates instance of MyOtherService provide(MyService, { useClass: MyOtherService })  // uses a factory function to create a dependency provide(MyService, { useFactory: () => return { foo: 'bar' } })  // injects a simple value provide(MyService, { useValue: true })

This is already pretty cool and powerful, because we can control what gets injected where in our application, without changing the application code itself.

Providers using Map Literals

As mentioned earlier, there’s a little change that makes the more verbose syntax a bit more ergonomic again. We can now define providers using Map literals. A Map literal, in TypeScript (or JavaScript) is really just an object hash. So instead of using the provide() function (which we need to import first), to create a provider, we can configure our providers using simple object structures.

Here’s one of our earlier snippets, but this time we use Map literals:

@Component({   selector: 'my-component',   template: '{{myService.sayHello()}}',   providers: [     { provide: MyService, useClass: MyOtherService }   ] }) class MyComponent {    constructor(private myService: MyService) {} }

Keep in mind that this is not a breaking change that has been introduced. It’s an additional syntax we can take advantage of. If you’re into saving key strokes, you might want to prefer Map literals over provide() .

转载本站任何文章请注明:转载至神刀安全网,谢谢神刀安全网 » Angular 2 Providers using Map Literals

分享到:更多 ()

评论 抢沙发

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址